The question of whether drinking coffee before sexual activity contributes to sexual performance has been mixed. Careful analysis of these claims can reveal some interesting phenomena.

　　 Supporter example: The American "Qiao Bao" reported a study conducted by the University of Michigan on 744 couples. The conclusion shows that drinking coffee can not only increase sexual desire but also reduce the chance of impotence (People''s Daily 2006) (Reported on January 9, 2016).

　　An example of opponents: "Life Times" 2008-09-09 published an article "The coffee drink too much affects sexual desire and erection state" by the chief physician of the male department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

　　The above are just examples of opinions. There are still many supporters and opponents. Is drinking coffee beneficial or harmful to sexual ability? The answer is actually very simple. You don’t even need to ask questions. Try it yourself. I know.

　　 Westerners are good at "research", Chinese people are good at "inference", but don’t forget that knowledge comes from practice, similar arguments (such as some people say that eating banana laxatives, others say they are right about constipation Invalid) As long as it is tested in practice (just try it), it is easy to draw conclusions-the most depressing thing is, some people will ask how to try? It is enough to see to what extent some people''s brains have become rigid "Research", "inference" and other book doctrines hurt-drink coffee once, change the day (but try to be under the same conditions, such as sexual activity objects must be the same person, the scene is basically the same...) If you do not drink coffee once, you will know the answer-if you really care about the answer.

　　Whether it is "research" that Westerners are good at, or "inference" that Chinese people are good at, once it is contrary to simple practice, it is very boring. It would be ridiculous if you still talk about it. Of course, boring problems can still be "researched". Even if the results of the research are worthless, the research itself (methodology or thinking) is still valuable; but "inference" is always just a word game and will not have any value- Sometimes, don’t look at the reasoning inference, but in fact it is very rigid, conservative, and nonsense.

　　 Some people prefer to believe in books and research; others prefer to believe inferences, or believe in ancestors'' "discipline" or leave a message; others believe in practice (try it). Moreover, every situation is imperfect, and the practice is also more complicated things (such as treatment) can not be tried casually, it is necessary to conduct research. However, as far as the effect of coffee on sexual performance is concerned, there is another important issue: the role of psychological suggestion. As we all know, sexual ability is easily affected by psychological suggestion, that is, if you believe that coffee is effective, then it is likely (it is possible, not certain and affirmative) that it really works; if you believe that coffee is invalid, It is likely to have no effect. I know that when many people talk about "psychological effect" or "psychological suggestion", they have a slight contempt or even sneered, but the effect is the last word, as long as there is an effect, even if it is a psychological effect (of course, it cannot be used to deceive people to accumulate money ) What does it matter?

　　 In short, as long as it is allowed, I agree to try and agree to feel it for myself; between "research" and "inference", I would rather choose to study; I am in favor of rigor, but against conservatism Doctrine, especially against this will not work, it is also taboo, this is not good, it is also harmful to the philosophy of shrinking turtles.